Inquisition/Witch
Hunts
To: Jenny
From: Summer
Date: 02 Apr 1997
Time: 12:15:58
Your talk about how most people were a mixture of the old
and the new has me wondering about the difference between
the Inquisition and the witch hunts. Some feminists would
have us believe it was all women who were persecuted and
killed but I understand the Inquisition to be much
broader, taking out all who believed differently in what
the church proclaimed.
In reading about the early Cathers and Templers I am
wondering how these people fit in. They obviously did not
believe as the established church would have them
believe.
I guess I just need to see the whole picture better.
To: Summer
From: Jenny
Date: 06 Apr 1997
Time: 07:46:01
The best analogy I can think of is, the Inquisition was
like the House Un-American Activities Committee of the
McCarthy Era, while the Witch hunts were like the Satanic
Panics of the 1980's.
The Inquisition was an order of the Catholic Church,
authorized to seek out and destroy religious dissent and
unorthodox beliefs (heresy). Formed in the 13th century,
it was part of the Church's increasingly violent
suppression of religious discussion. In 1022 the Church
began killing heretics, usually by burning them at the
stake. Crusades began in the late 11th century, and were
accompanied by pogroms against the Jews. The Inquisition
appears in the 13th century, and in the early 14th the
Church starts to call Crusades against heretics inside
Europe, like the Cathars. This trend continued until the
Reformation, when the Protestant churches defected from
the Catholic Church.
The Witch trials were quite different. Around 1320,
periodic panics swept central Europe. Some group of
evil-doers was trying to poison the wells, to overthrow
the Christian Church, to kill all Christians. The groups
"involved" in this conspiracy changed. First it
was Jews and lepers, then Jews and Moslems and lepers.
Later still, Witches "joined forces" with the
Jews. The Witch trials were a direct outgrowth of these
rumor panics. (Carlo Ginzburg's _Ecstasies: Deciphering
the Witches' Sabbat_ covers this in detail.)
As a side note, there's a lot of confusion about the
Inquisition's role in the Witch trials.
The Inquisition did very little Witch hunting. Before the
14th century, the Inquisition was specifically
*forbidden* from investigating charges of Witchcraft
(Witches were "victims of Pagan superstitions",
not heretics who sought to undermine the Church's
teachings). From around 1300 - 1500 they did kill
Witches, but not very many. As late as 1484, the author
of the _Malleus Maleficarum_ complained that he couldn't
get his fellow inquisitors to cooperate with his Witch
hunts. By 1500 the Inquisition turned its attention to
early Protestant groups. During the height of the Burning
Times (1550-1650) the Inquisition only existed in two
countries: Spain and Italy, both of which had low death
tolls. The Spanish Inquisition in fact had the best
acquital record, killing far less than 1% of all accused
Witches!
So where does the image of the malevolent, Witch hunting
inquisitor come from? From a forgery and from a common
translation error.
A 19th century forger, Etienne Leon de Lamothe Langon,
wrote a book called "The History of the Inquisition
in France" in which he claimed that the French
Inquisition launched the first massive Witch hunts in
southern France in the early 1300's. Centered in
Toulousse and Carcasonne, these were lethal affairs where
as many as 400 women were killed in one day. Because of
this book, for almost 200 years scholars assumed that the
rise of the Witch trials must tie into the Cathar
persecutions (which occurred in the same area). In 1972,
two scholars uncovered Lamothe Langon's forgery, and this
profoundly changed our view of the early history of Witch
hunting. (I'll skip the details on the forgery -- unless
you're interested.) However this forgery continues to
have a notable impact on the Neo-Pagan community, which
often cites that non-existant "400 in one day"
trial.
The second problem is, missing the difference between a
"trial by the Inquisition" and "a trial by
inquisition." The Inquisition was a branch of the
Church. It created a legal procedure, called the
inquisitorial procedure, which was adopted by most courts
throughout Europe -- both religious courts and
non-religious courts. The new type of trial was called
"an inquisition" (questioning). Since almost
all courts used the inquisitorial system, almost all
Witch trials were done "by inquisition." This
led many early scholars to erroneously assume that the
Inquisition itself was the primary force for Witch
hunting. You'll still see this error in later books,
though. Rossell Hope Robbins' _The Encyclopedia of
Witchcraft and Demonology_ makes this mistake repeatedly.
Return to
Archived Threads
|